CFB Saturdays

Working all week just to get to Saturday

Football by Numbers

Who is the best in the Recruiting Rankings Industry?

Every year college football fans study the recruits set to enroll with their beloved team.  They go over the rankings to figure out what their team is getting.  No one knows which rankings are the most accurate, so usually they just go by the rankings that best favor their college team.

What if there was a way to figure out who does the best job of ranking high school prospects?  This post sets out to try and achieve this goal in a somewhat efficient manner. 

Methodology

The problem with judging rankings is that it is all subjective.  Often fans and experts alike cannot agree which player was better even after their college career is over.  As a result, to judge the rankings we used the only truly objective metric we have, the NFL Draft. 

It would be cumbersome to go through every player drafted, and every ranked player that went undrafted so we chose a system that could be executed in a more time efficient manner.  For the purposes of our rankings we are going to use ESPN, 247Sports and Rivals.  They have been in the business of ranking these players for a while and have ranked all the classes that contributed to this draft.

First, we look at the players drafted in the 1st round of the 2020 NFL Draft, and where they were ranked by the recruiting industry.  Then we calculate the difference between the draft position and the ranking, if a player is not ranked, we will assign a ranking of 350 for that site, so that no one can get credit for a player not ranked.  The closer your ranking is to the actual draft position the more points you receive.  Points are given as follows:

Difference in RankingPoints Awarded
1 to 20 spots5
21 to 50 spots4
51 to 100 spots3
101 to 150 spots2
150 to 250 spots1
More than 250 Spots0

Then after looking at the players selected in the 1st round, we go back and look at the players ranked in the top 32 by each service that were available in this year’s draft.  We list each of these players and compare their ranking to where they were drafted.  Undrafted players get a draft position of 1000 so no one can get credit for 1 of their top 32 going undrafted.  Using the same table as above we score each service and find the cumulative score. 

This way we will be able to grade based on 1) who the actual best players were (the top 32 picks in the draft), and 2) who the services thought the best players were (players ranked in each site’s top 32).

Results

Now the fun part.  Time to find out who is the 2020 champion of recruiting rankings.

PickPlayer247 RankRivals RankESPN Rank247 DiffRivals DiffESPN Diff247 PointsRivals PointsESPN Points
1Joe Burrow210350298209349297100
2Chase Young48272625554
3Jeff Okudah121679134555
4Andrew Thomas378840338436434
5Tua Tagovailoa225357174852543
6Justin Herbert350350350344344344000
7Derrick Brown61791102555
8Isaiah Simmons350350350342342342000
9CJ Henderson116226131107217122212
10Jedrick Wills562533461523454
11Mekhi Becton350195350339184339010
12Henry Ruggs2412516612113154521
13Tristan Wirfs126350350113337337200
14Javon Kinlaw350350350336336336000
15Jerry Juedy3519202045555
16AJ Terrell611310645390453
17CeeDee Lamb2467229022955273130
18Austin Jackson21775435936534
19Damon Arnette350350350331331331000
20K’Lavion Chaisson111103499014535
21Jalen Reagor69249434822822414
22Justin Jefferson350350350328328328000
23Kenneth Murray350350350327327327000
24Cesar Ruiz55412831174455
25Brandon Aiyuk350350350325325325000
26Jordan Love350350350324324324000
27Jordyn Brooks350350350323323323000
28Patrick Queen350214350322186322010
29Isaiah Wilson39172101227554
30Noah Igbinoghene350350350320320320000
31Jeff Gladney350350350319319319000
32Clyde Edwards-Helaire350350219318318187001

Using these results, we arrive at the following scores:

NetworkTotal for Players in Round 1
247Sports71
Rivals62
ESPN59

Now we jump to the players eligible for this draft that were not drafted in the Top 32.  Here we gather the data by each service because there are different players ranked for each service in their top 32.

ESPN:

NameYearRankDraft PositionDiffPoints
Keisean Lucier South20152210009780
George Campbell2015710009930
Blake Barnett20152310009770
Shea Patterson20161510009850
Jacob Eason2016131221092
Shaq Smith20162110009790
Marlon Davidson20163247155
Levonta Taylor2016510009950
Keandre Jones20162810009720
McTelvin Agim20161195843
Rashad Lawrence2016121311192
Benito Jones2016710009930
Jeffrey McCullogh20162610009740
Kristian Fulton20162761344
Tee Higgens20171833155
Cam Akers2017952434
Donovan Peoples Jones2017221871651

247Sports:

PlayerYearRankDraft PositionDiffPoints
Blake Barnett20152310009770
Osa Masina20152510009750
Chidi Okeke20152210009780
Shea Patterson2016310009970
Jacob Eason201631221192
Oluwale Betiku2016910009910
Tommy Kraemer2016810009920
Levonta Taylor20161110009890
Tavien Feaster20161410009860
Michael Divinity20161810009820
Rashad Lawrence2016201311112
Michael Pittman Jr20162234125
Terrell Lewis20162384613
Kristian Fulton20162861334
McTelvin Agim20163195643
AJ Epenesa2017654484
Cam Akers2017752454
Donovan Peoples Jones2017261871611
Colby Parkinson2017281331052

Rivals:

PlayerYearRankDraft PositionDiffPoints
Keisean Lucier South20151410009860
George Campbell20152610009740
John Houston20153010009700
Shea Patterson2016310009970
Jacob Eason201671221152
Shaq Smith2016610009940
Marlon Davidson20162547224
Levonta Taylor20161010009900
Keandre Jones20163010009700
Tee Higgens20171533185
Jake Fromm2017201671472
Darnay Holmes201727110833
Jacob Phillips20172997683
AJ Epenesa20173054244
Cam Akers2017352494
Donovan Peoples Jones2017121871751

And finally, the final score board:

NetworkTotal for Players in Round 1Total for Players in Service’s Top 32 Not Drafted in Round 1Total Score
247Sports7130101
Rivals622890
ESPN592685

Conclusions:

This year 247Sports wins by a nice margin.  Rivals and ESPN were closer to each other than they were to 247Sports on the final scoreboard.   However, Rivals should get some credit for having the fewest undrafted players ranked in their top 32, that were eligible for this draft.  Rivals had 7 such players while both the other services had 9. 

It’s impressive there are quite a few players the services were spot on in ranking. That’s really a credit to the hard work these sites do, its hard enough to tell if a college senior will be successful in the NFL, and here they are predicting where a 17 year old will be drafted 3 to 5 years later.

Lastly, if you did not win this year, work on your craft and get better!  We will be back to do it again next year and hopefully many years to come.  If you are interested in past years contact us and we may dig into them over the summer and post the findings.  If you have your own rankings and want to be considered feel free to contact us, you must have rankings that were published for the 2015, 2016 and 2017 recruiting class to be eligible.

For the latest content follow us on twitter @saturdayscfb & @cfbsaturdaysC or on Facebook at www.facebook.com/CFBSaturdays.